The Pentagon’s Afghan Mineral Hype

This morning’s New York Times includes a story headlined, “US Identifies Vast Riches of Minerals in Afghanistan.’’ In fact the country’s  mineral wealth has been known for centuries. Records of it date back to the time of Marco Polo. Mineral stories were mapped by the Soviets during their occupation of the country, and more recently by other mining experts. While it’s possible that the team of Pentagon officials and American geologists credited with the “discovery” may have added some detail to existing knowledge on the subject, it’s hardly the revelation their reports–and the article–suggest.

So could this “revelation” in fact be an Obama administration PR campaign to buttress U.S. involvement in the war in Afghanistan? For years, we were told of Afghanistan’s potential valuable oil prospects. When oil faded from the picture there was no economic reason to be there. The place wasn’t like Iraq, where the international oil companies got their hands on a huge oil reserve. But now, with the Times apparently swallowing the Pentagon’s bait, we’ve suddenly got a new reason to fight: Getting our hands on a lucrative mining colony. James Risen in the Times reports : 

The United States has discovered nearly $1 trillion in untapped mineral deposits in Afghanistan, far beyond any previously known reserves and enough to fundamentally alter the Afghan economy and perhaps the Afghan war itself, according to senior American government officials.

The previously unknown deposits — including huge veins of iron, copper, cobalt, gold and critical industrial metals like lithium — are so big and include so many minerals that are essential to modern industry that Afghanistan could eventually be transformed into one of the most important mining centers in the world, the United States officials believe.

An internal Pentagon memo, for example, states that Afghanistan could become the “Saudi Arabia of lithium,” a key raw material in the manufacture of batteries for laptops and BlackBerrys.

The vast scale of Afghanistan’s mineral wealth was discovered by a small team of Pentagon officials and American geologists. The Afghan government and President Hamid Karzai were recently briefed, American officials said.

Running counter to the claims of a huge discovery is an existing undated  report called Minerals in Afghanistan, prepared by the Afghan minining ministry  jointly with the British Geological Survey and easily obtained on the web. The report has  this to say on the subject:

In central Afghanistan occurrences of rare metals have been identified in sediments below several lakes and depressions where lake brines contain higher than average metal concentrations. Trial pits have indicated that salt deposits covered by clay and loam layers contain high concentrations of lithium, boron, lead and zinc.

In a 2006 special edition on Afghanistan of Mining Journal, pre-eminent publication in the field, the mining minister, Hon.Eng. Ibrahim Adel, writes in the introduction,

It is a privilege for me to draw your attention to this Mining Journal special supplement on Afghanistan. Mining in Afghanistan has a history dating back over 6,000 years, and despite all the upheavals over the past 25 years, mining has continued to operate. The main task facing us now is to expand the industry from its present small base. The Government regards the development of Afghanistan’s natural resources as the most important driver of economic growth, and essential to the reconstruction and development of the country…For example, construction minerals production has grown dramatically with the increased need for raw materials to feed road building and reconstruction. I expect this will be followed shortly by further investment in the coal, cement and hydrocarbons industries. The first signs of grassroots mineral exploration for gold have started, and with the appointment of Tender Advisors for the future development of the world class Aynak copper deposit, I expect this to lead to really significant investment in the mining sector of the economy in the very near future. Aynak is one of the world’s largest undeveloped copper deposits and it has already attracted interest from a wide spectrum of international companies.

Mining Journal provides an in depth account of the history and potential for mining all sorts of minerals. Here is the Journal‘s overview: 

Afghanistan has some of the most complex and varied geology in the world. The oldest rocks are Archean and they are succeeded by rocks from the Proterozoic and every Phanerozoic system up to the present day. The country also has a long and complicated tectonic history, partly related to its position at the western end of the Himalayas.

This diverse geological foundation has resulted in a significant mineral heritage with over 1,400 mineral occurrences recorded to date. Historical mining concentrated mostly on precious stone production, with some of the oldest known mines in the world established in Afghanistan to produce lapis lazuli for the Egyptian Pharaohs. 

More recent exploration in the 1960s and 70s resulted in the discovery of significant resources ofmetallic minerals, including copper, iron and gold, and non-metallic minerals, including halite, talc and mica. The bedrock geology of Afghanistan can be thought of as a jigsaw of crustal blocks separated by fault zones, each with a different geological history and mineral prospectivity. This jigsaw has been put together by a series of tectonic events dating from the Jurassic up to the present.

Among other things, Afghan emeralds are generally considered to be among the most beautiful in the world, rivaling the emeralds produced in Colombia. They were mined and sold for arms during the time of the Northern Alliance; the famous Mujahideen leader Ahmed Shah Massoud funded his campaign by selling emeralds from the Panjshir Valley. More recently, sources with first hand knowledge of the business have reported that Afghan emeralds were blocked by the Colombian emerald cartel, though there are reports of Afghan emeralds being traded on the sly through Eastern Europe.

6 responses to “The Pentagon’s Afghan Mineral Hype

  1. Brzezinski. Grand Chessboard. Nuff said.

  2. This is reminiscent of when (then Deputy Secretary of Defense) Paul Wolfowitz lied that the cost of reconstruction in Iraq would “pay for itself” from oil revenues.

    Given that one (simple and capitalistic) argument for getting out of Afghanistan is the COST of the war (forget the imperialism and lack of legal justification), then this “sudden” discovery of resources that can be “tapped,” is designed to make the illegal, immoral, and unnecessary war more palatable to the American People.

    Good work on the (once great) New York Times for carrying the water of the military / industrial / security complex in promoting never-ending war and conflict.

  3. This is a time-(dis)honored means of generating war fervor. Gen. Custer “found” gold in the Black Hills and began the war which resulted in his infamous demise.

    Support for remaining in Afghanistan is waning, and those who would benefit from remaining have to subvert the revelation that Pakistan’s ISI is working against us, and that Afghan “President” Karzai is losing faith in us (has he not already threatened to join the Taliban himself?). One can’t expand the war in the region to include Pakistan unless the original basis for the war is iron-clad. Protecting “our” mineral assets would be a good reason to take down the Pakistani government and to confiscate its nuclear arsenal. That way, more of our jobs would be saved from nuclear annihilation once they are relocated to India!

  4. I did notice the odd enthusiasm for what seemed like no surprise…”What? You mean there’s minerals in the earth? *gasp*” and its sudden flood of talking points into the news feeds. I agree, this seems like a policy to buttress support for the (attempted) occupation or attract allies. Plus the usual wishful thinking of occupiers…the thought that if WE could just be able to develop their resources for them; “then, you know…they’d be cool with us.”

    We’ll see what talking points follow swiftly upon this – more imaginary wins in Marja or yet another ‘third in command’ killed and the war yet again ‘near its end’. Or perhaps really flattering stuff about Karzhai (sp?).

  5. Vic Anderson

    So now we should be killing and DYING to deprive the Afghans of their other minerals, as ill? Sooooo … can we put the Minerals Management Service in charge of this Unnatural DISASTER, too?

  6. Another ploy to fool in investments from the neighbouring Gulf Countries to pour in their petro $ in this war ravaged country, where they cannot get others involved in the conflict now despearately trying to get them involved with economic interests, Let the native people enjoy their natural resources and stop trying to exploit them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s